Five Behaviors of a Cohesive Team: Accountability = Support?

on
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1882
  • 0 Comments
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

b2ap3_thumbnail_Climbers-resized-for-blog-photo.jpgArticle by Jim Jensen...

Are Accountability and Support the Same Thing? We believe they are. Or at least in the context of effective teaming they certainly can be.

Crux Move Consulting became an authorized partner provider of The Five Behaviors of a Cohesive Team™ when the program was first launched last year (2014). We had been using the pyramid model from The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, by Patrick Lencioni, since the book came out in 2002, so we were excited to explore the process that is based on the model. It’s all good stuff; it gives us another avenue to extend the work that we have done with leadership teams for years, and will help us, help them to get more specific on how to ensure that they are functioning effectively and achieving their shared goals. 

Accountability is the fourth of the five behaviors of a cohesive team. In the context of teamwork, Lencioni defines accountability as the willingness of team members to call their peers on performance or behaviors that hurt the team, or that seem counterproductive to the good of the team. For those of you who have read the original book and perhaps his more recent book, The Advantage - Why Organizational Health Trumps Everything Else in Business, we’d like to share our spin on accountability. According to Lencioni, even once there is a fairly solid level of trust on a leadership team, and once they are able to engage in healthy conflict and passionate debate, and are thus able to get true commitment and buy-in, holding one another accountable is still incredibly challenging. He says that of all five behaviors it’s the hardest one for teams to embrace, and that getting people to hold one another accountable is by far the most difficult part of forming a cohesive team. 

Our experience supports that perception, as does the data that we compiled using our own pre and post team-self-assessment scores for leadership teams we worked with over a two-year period. Even though teams demonstrated significant gains in their functioning from pre to post, holding fellow teammates accountable to their commitments is often one of the lowest scoring post assessment items. (Click here to see the report)

So why is holding your peers accountable so difficult? One reason is that peers don’t have position authority over each other. Maybe more importantly though, it can be uncomfortable, especially if it feels like confrontation.  If it feels like confrontation it can be uncomfortable even if you do have position authority. Our belief is that a simple reframe of what it means to hold a peer or a direct report accountable can have a profound effect, on both parties. 

In our mind there is great value in directly labeling “accountability as support”. Support has a significantly different feel than confronting or confrontation. Having a mindset of support makes it more likely that people can provide it (without coming off as accusatory) and more likely that people can receive it (without feeling defensive or small). A team that has a shared understanding of accountability as support is going to adopt accountability as a norm more easily. It will keep the intent in the forefront of people’s minds. 

So in our minds, holding each other accountable means “supporting” each other when things begin to slip. It might be as simple as that. For example, “Pete, you said you were going to ensure that your meetings start and end on time. How’s that going?” Or “Marty, you committed to making sure that meeting minutes with action items get dispersed. I’m not sure people are leaving the meetings knowing what they’re supposed to do.” or, “Sue, you said you were going to have a report ready to share at our meeting next Monday. Are you all set with that?” With this mindset of accountability, in a trusting environment, people often appreciate when others hold them accountable. They feel supported. We’d also say that with this mindset, holding someone accountable has nothing to do with being the “bad guy.”  

So might it make sense to have a discussion around this definition of accountability with your team? Having a shared definition of accountability can help people to be cognizant of their own intent; it can also help you be more aware of the intent of others as they are trying to figure out how to support you.

The benefits of living in a team environment where "accountability support" is the norm are many. When a team gets good at having the “accountability discussions”, exploration that could lead to innovative thinking, re-ranking of priorities, or getting someone the support they need is more likely to happen.  Basically then, team members are not left to struggle on their own. (Click here to visit our Five Behaviors web page)

Last modified on
0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Tuesday, 16 January 2018

Crux Move is an authorized partner provider of The Five Behaviors of a Cohesive Team™

Click Here to learn more...

Five Behaviors Authorized Partner logo 230x46

 

 

and Everything DiSC™

everything-disc-partner-logo 160x49

 

Crux Move Testimonials

With more than 50 years of combined experience in Leadership and Team Development, Crux Move Consulting has amassed a list of well satisfied clients.

Click here to review our growing list of testimonials.